🗳️Overview

The system that makes contribution—not capital—the source of power.

---

🗳️ Governance Architecture

📐 Voting	🔒 Ceiling	🛡️ Treasury	⚖️ Balance
Quadratic	4× maximum	Safety rails	Contributors lead

🎯 Core Mechanism: EQTBLT balance determines voting power. EQTBLT is earned, not bought.

⚖️ Design Goal: Capital can fund the DAO. Labor governs it.

---

The Governance Problem

Most DAOs fail the same way: money becomes votes, whales dominate decisions, contributors exit.

Failure Mode	What Happens	Our Solution
💰 Plutocracy	Rich buy voting control	EQTBLT cannot be purchased
🐋 Whale capture	Single actors dominate	4× power ceiling
😴 Passive ownership	Old holders control without working	Recency-weighted activity
🏃 Contributor exodus	Workers leave when capital captures	Contributors have primary power
⚠️ Treasury raids	Bad proposals drain funds	Safety rails + council veto

Built By DAO's governance is designed to make these failures structurally impossible.

---

Governance Flow

flowchart LR
    subgraph Earn["1️⃣ Earn Power"]
        WORK["🔨 Complete Tasks"]
        RENT["🏠 Pay Rent"]
        PART["🗳️ Participate"]
    end

    subgraph Hold["2️⃣ Hold EQTBLT"]
        EQ["💎 EQTBLT Balance"]
        RANK["🎖️ Rank Multiplier"]
        ACT["⏰ Activity Weight"]
    end

    subgraph Vote["3️⃣ Vote"]
        PROP["📝 Proposal"]
        QV["📊 Quadratic Vote"]
        CAP["🔒 4× Ceiling"]
    end

    subgraph Execute["4️⃣ Execute"]
        PASS["✅ Passes >50%"]
        RAILS["🛡️ Safety Rails"]
        AUTO["⚡ Auto-Execute"]
    end

    WORK --> EQ
    RENT --> EQ
    PART --> EQ

    EQ --> QV
    RANK --> QV
    ACT --> QV
    QV --> CAP

    PROP --> CAP
    CAP --> PASS
    PASS --> RAILS
    RAILS --> AUTO

The path to power: Contribution → EQTBLT → Voting Weight → Proposal Outcomes. No shortcuts.

---

📊 Voting Power

📊 How Voting Power Works

Your voting power combines multiple factors, all capped at 4× maximum.

---

Components

Component	Range	How It Works
🔢 Base	1.0×	Every member starts here
🏠 EQTBLT Balance	Quadratic	√(balance) × 100
🎖️ Rank Bonus	0-25%	Higher ranks earn multiplier
⏰ Activity Recency	Weighted	Recent activity counts more
💰 Investor Multiplier	1.5×-5.0×	NFT tier bonus

---

The Quadratic Formula

Voting Power = √(EQTBLT Balance) × 100

This creates diminishing returns:

EQTBLT	Raw Power	Capped Power
100	1,000	1,000
1,000	3,162	3,162
10,000	10,000	4× ceiling
100,000	31,623	4× ceiling

The more you accumulate, the less each additional token matters. This prevents concentration.

---

The 4× Ceiling

No one can have more than 4× the base voting power, regardless of:

Factor	Still Capped?
EQTBLT balance	✅
Membership rank	✅
Investment amount	✅
Activity level	✅

Even the most active, highest-rank, biggest investor cannot exceed 4× base power.

📝 Proposals

🛡️ Safety Rails

👥 Eligibility

🔍 Transparency

⚡ Quick Reference

---

❓ Governance FAQ

Q: Can investors control the DAO? A: No. The 4× power ceiling and EQTBLT requirement ensures contributors maintain governance primacy. An investor with no EQTBLT has zero voting power.

Q: What prevents whale capture? A: Quadratic voting creates diminishing returns, and the 4× ceiling caps maximum power regardless of holdings.

Q: Can the treasury be drained? A: Safety rails limit withdrawals to 10%/proposal, 5%/day, 20%/month, with 15% always retained. These cannot be bypassed.

Q: Who can submit proposals? A: Any member with a Membership NFT who stakes 2 BLTBY. Investors cannot submit proposals.

Q: What happens if governance is compromised? A: The Leadership Council can emergency veto proposals that threaten the core mission. Multiple council members must agree.

---

🔗 Governance Deep Dives

Topic	Documentation
📊 Voting Power	How Voting Works
📝 Proposals	Proposal System
🛡️ Treasury	Treasury & Safety Rails
🔄 Process	Full Governance Flow

---

🔗 Related Pages

Voting PowerProposalsTreasuryEQTBLT Token👥Overview