Investors participate in Built By DAO governance with enhanced voting power while maintaining the principle that contributors lead the organization.
β Enhanced power
β Members only
β Council only
4Γ maximum
βοΈ Principle: Investors participate, contributors lead
π Angel 1
$10k-$25k
1.5Γ
π Angel 2
$25k-$50k
1.8Γ
π Angel 3
$50k-$100k
2.2Γ
π Angel 4
$100k-$175k
2.6Γ
π Angel 5
$175k-$250k
3.0Γ
π VentureOne 1
$500k-$1M
3.5Γ
π VentureOne 2
$1M-$2M
3.8Γ
π VentureOne 3
$2M-$3.5M
4.1Γ
π VentureOne 4
$3.5M-$5M
4.5Γ
ποΈ Trust
$5M+
5.0Γ
Base Power = β(EQTBLT Balance) Γ 100 Investor Power = Base Γ Investor Multiplier Final Power = min(Investor Power, Base Γ 4)
π EQTBLT Balance
5,000
π’ Base Power
β5000 Γ 100 = 7,071
βοΈ Investor Multiplier
π Calculated Power
15,556
π 4Γ Ceiling
28,284
π³οΈ Final Power
π Prevent whale control
No single investor dominates
βοΈ Balance interests
Contributors maintain primacy
π₯ Broad participation
Many voices matter
π³οΈ Vote on all proposals
β
π¬ Participate in discussions
π Access proposal details
π See voting records
1οΈβ£
Connect wallet to governance app
2οΈβ£
Browse active proposals
3οΈβ£
Review proposal details
4οΈβ£
Cast vote (For/Against/Abstain)
5οΈβ£
Confirm transaction
All investors can vote on:
βοΈ Operational
>50%
Platform upgrades
π° Financial
>60%
Budget allocations
ποΈ Governance
>65%
Policy changes
π³οΈ Active voting
Stay engaged with DAO direction
π¬ Discussion
Shape proposal outcomes
π Monitoring
Track investment performance
π Proposal submission
Reserved for contributing members
π BLTBY staking
Not required for voting (only proposals)
π― Reason
Ensures those doing work set priorities
π 4Γ ceiling
Limits maximum investor power
π Quadratic voting
Diminishing returns on holdings
π₯ EQTBLT primacy
Contributors have base voting power
π¨ Veto power
Reserved for Leadership Council
Investors don't have mission oversight role
π Soul-bound
NFT stays with original wallet
Prevents vote buying/selling
π Angel
Quarterly governance summaries
π VentureOne
Monthly briefings
Weekly updates + advance notice
π Governance portal
All proposals, votes, results
π§ Email updates
Proposal announcements
π¬ Investor channels
Discussion and analysis
π Briefing calls
Deep-dive discussions
π Summary
What the proposal does
π― Impact
Effects on DAO operations
π° Cost
Financial implications
β οΈ Risks
Potential downsides
π₯ Discussion
Community sentiment
π― Mission alignment
Does it advance housing mission?
π° Financial prudence
Is the cost justified?
π‘οΈ Risk assessment
Are risks acceptable?
π₯ Community view
What do contributors think?
πͺ They do the work
Contributors build the DAO daily
π They're affected
Decisions impact their work/housing
π They know context
Deep understanding of operations
Committed to housing mission
π° Provide capital
Fund development and growth
π Offer perspective
External viewpoint
βοΈ Check balance
Diverse stakeholder input
π€ Aligned interests
Want DAO to succeed
Limits any single voter
π Quadratic
Diminishing returns
π₯ EQTBLT base
Contributors have foundation
ποΈ Council
Mission protection
β±οΈ Vesting
Aligns timeline with DAO
No short-term flipping
π³οΈ Ongoing voting
Sustained engagement
π Stay informed
Read proposals thoroughly
π¬ Engage discussion
Share perspective respectfully
π³οΈ Vote consistently
Participate in all votes
π― Mission focus
Prioritize housing impact
π Listen first
Understand contributor perspective
π€ Collaborate
Offer expertise, not demands
π‘ Add value
Share relevant experience
π― Support mission
Align with DAO purpose
π Trying to dominate
Work within system
π Short-term focus
Embrace long-term vision
π« Ignoring contributors
Value their input
π° Pure profit focus
Remember housing mission
β Consistent participation
Demonstrates commitment
π¬ Constructive feedback
Adds value
π€ Supporting community
Builds relationships
π Transparent intentions
Creates trust
π³οΈ Voting Power β Full voting calculation
π Proposals β How proposals work
ποΈ Leadership Council β Oversight structure
Last updated 15 days ago